- 문법
-
해설강의보기
1. 다음
문장 중 어법상 옳지 않은 것은?
① Without
the Internet, life today would be slower and less interesting.
② We
were amazed by the way how the dancers performed.
③ A cactus is a desert plant that has
adapted to very dry conditions.
④ The
full moon was on the horizon by the time they arrived.
-
해설강의보기
2. 밑줄 친 부분 중 어법상 옳지 않은 것은?
I couldn’t ① see
anything outside of the train car because I was sitting down. Most of the
passengers near me were either asleep ② or staring at their mobile
phones. I had awakened early to catch the train, and my body was ③ tiring.
At that moment, I told ④ myself to quit my job, but then I wouldn’t be
able to pay my bills.
- 어휘
-
해설강의보기
1. 다음 대화를 읽고 글의 흐름상 빈칸에 들어갈 적당한 말은?
|
A:
I thought our team lost last night’s game. What happened?
B:
They were able to _____________ during the last few minutes and won 3 to 2.
A:
I can’t believe it. I thought we had definitely lost, so I stopped watching.
B:
You should’ve watched until the end. It was really exciting!
|
① get cold feet
② cut to the chase
③ take a nosedive
④ turn the tables
-
해설강의보기
2. 다음 밑줄 친 부분의 의미와 가장 유사한 것은?
|
He
strongly considered hiring an outside consultant, even though it meant he
would have to breach regulations.
|
① infringe
② uphold
③ enforce
④ amend
- 독해
-
해설강의보기
1. Rearrange the sentences (A), (B), (C), (D) so that they make sense.
Fugu, also known as the blowfish, is a
highly poisonous fish that is a popular delicacy in Asia.
(A) The final part of the assessment
consists of the chefs eating the fugu that they have prepared.
(B) If they have successfully removed
all of the poison, they are then granted a license to serve the dish to the
public.
(C) This training usually takes several
years, after which the chefs are tested on their ability to cut the fish
correctly.
(D) Chefs must be properly trained
before they are allowed to serve the dish, since the fish’s
toxin is fatal.
① (C)
- (B) - (D) - (A)
② (A)
- (B) - (C) - (D)
③ (D)
- (C) - (A) - (B)
④ (B)
- (D) - (A) - (C)
-
해설강의보기
2. 다음 글의 제목으로 가장 적절한 것은?
|
The traditional method of taking sample counts was used to
measure the approximate amount of plastic in the ocean in 2014. The data told
ecologists that there was 245,000 tons of it at most. Unfortunately, having
used a new model to calculate ocean plastic, scientists now know that this is
a far cry from the actual quantity. The true statistics are much more
frightening. In 2010 alone, it turns out that 8 million tons of plastic was
actually discarded, and that number is predicted to increase tenfold by 2020
if current waste management procedures remain the same. “The bad news, of
course, is that the previous calculations were wildly off the mark,” says one
expert. “The good
news is that we have more accurate readings; data that will help us figure out better ways
to handle trash.”
|
① Effects of Too Much Plastic in the Oceans
② The Best Way to Measure Debris in the Sea
③ Why Ocean Plastic Has Been Miscalculated
④ A Gross Underestimation of Ocean Waste
